I was just watching this video on youtube about "should images be sharp" (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G8ZLlPY19uI)
and started to wonder. His example photo is a bit soft also due to age and analog technology. But still, can I get away with more obvious unsharpness and still have a photo which evokes an other feeling besides "he shouldn't.. really!"
So here's an unsharp photo and my question, could I get away with it.. ;-)
@Jondor - I think there is a culture of having 'OVER' sharp images these days. Complete back to front sharpness.
While this can work for some scenes it doesn't for all. In my view 'sharpness' is overused and comes from the digital ability to pixel-peep at 100% and from a few inches away from the image...
Think about how you might look at a painting in a gallery? From a few inches or maybe a few feet..!
What is the image conveying, if we want to convey movement then we should see blurring. The image you have posted conveys movement and I can clearly see what it represents. For me it is not a fail.
@matt thank you. I agree that to much presure is on the sharpness and for some subjects I agree with that (fe. my mushroom and flower images) but for other images there's a different story where absolute sharpness isn't the main key.
As for this photo I'm a bit torn, it invokes a "feel" for me but I also feel that there should be something a little sharper than is the case. Which makes it a good discussion point I guess..;)
@Jondor - i can see lateral blurring of the uninteresting background 😄 So clearly you were panning the camera R to L to try and catch the Magpie in flight..? if that was your intention then the photo clearly Fails..!
The outcome however though is a happy one in that the subject is recognisable, shows movement BUT is not so blurred that it becomes abstract.
Are these images blurred, abstract or failures..?
@matt Have on alike that too (https://500px.com/photo/168516239/abstract-by-gerhard-hoogterp) but the magpie was suddenly escaping and I wasn't fast enough to track it. So the result wasn't intentional.
That said, I'm also a believer of the idea that you make your luck by being prepared. A lucky shot may be lucky, but one was still there and more or less ready to make the image...
@Jondor - super image.
@Jondor - the HCB image in the youtube video really is a poor choice as it depicts not a lack of sharpness ,but Depth of Field.
These are two distinct parts of an image as you know.
@matt I agree especially since it's more about the state of the equipment anyhow.
Have seen an exposition of HCB's photo's in London a few years ago.. They are really nice!
@Jondor - one doesn't need 'state of the art' equipment...
I have a Sony A7r lying unused for over one year, because i am taking photographs with a cardboard box I took from the rubbish... It provides images that to me have more texture, depth and interest than the A7r ever did.
If photography is about the equipment then what is the point of the image 😆 ..?
@Jondor I think the problem I see with the image is that nothing is really in focus. To invoke speed, the background could be clear. To invoke movement, the subject could be clear. But everything doesn’t have to be clear, just a part of it.
@alric I think I agree. While it does invoke a story for me (the magpie that got away) there should be *something* sharp(er). Thanks!
A place for your photos and banter. Photog first is our motto