One thing I've learned about my blogging; the more I outline and flirt with the subject, the more I over-complicate and get in my own head. I do better with sitting down and just writing my ideas in article form from the start.
So, with that said, I'm going to try to get a post out tonight. Hope to have something done before I go to sleep.
Holy, holy crap. Ok, the 54th time was the charm (not exaggerating). I finally generated a LUT that consistently represented my existing preset. The rub was that LUTs don’t handle certain LR developing settings well - so after applying the profile I‘ll still need to set them...
In a preset.
Not a fun day-and-a-half.
@jackbaty Welcome! Nice shots man. 👍
Below is an example. It's a throw-away photo, but the rendering is what caught me. The focus is off and the subject is soft. But I loved the look - it has enough detail to get the point across, but the unimportant details aren't able to be rendered.
Now all of the sudden I'm smitten with the idea of playing with a '40's or '50's era lens.
I find myself looking at some recent photos and actually not appreciating the sharpness - meaning I wish they were softer. There's a harshness to them and a "noisiness" it brings to the composition by rendering all the gross details.
I never, ever thought I would be saying this and it's interesting to me to see how much my practice and point of view has changed.
The two main insights I came to were:
1) Man, Adobe has been in the imagining space for *so long* and they're getting outplayed in raw processing output? That seems like fundamental problem...
2) If only Capture One would take the time to apply some serious, dedicated focus on their interface design...
Spent some time with Capture One again. Without a doubt there's a significant difference in performance. Raw processing quality definitely was "better" in certain cases.
But man, that UI... It's just so rough.
If I was a landscape photographer or portrait photographer, I'd perhaps begrudgingly switch over. But Lightroom Classic CC continues to be numero uno (for better or worse).
Interesting discussion on the aesthetics of journalistic photography: https://www.economist.com/prospero/2018/08/22/how-should-a-news-photograph-look
This teen social scientist still needs 60+ survey responses for her research about patriotism and its correlation to other opinions! Americans 18+ only.
Help, help! https://goo.gl/forms/tZDvJTaLAZ6MuiLQ2
@jordan Of note: There still isn't a *great* native Mac client for Mastodon. Definitely a need that I'm hoping gets addressed in the near future.
@jordan Hey man, welcome to Mastodon! I work at Disney Streaming Services and our design team has been using Abstract since the beta.
I'm a sucker for design tools - I led the Inspect and Craft Sync initiatives at InVision at couple years ago. It's a fun time to watch the landscape of design tech!
San Francisco photographer, among other things.
A place for your photos and banter. Photog first is our motto
- photog.social doesn't monetize or profit off of your personal information
- Export and leave anytime
- Zero tolerance for harassment or bullying, if you do this your account will be deleted
- All content is ©️ each user and cannot be distributed or used without prior permission by the respective photog.social user
- By using this site you understand that it is not a backup or permanent repository for your information, statuses or media ; additionally, your media was downsized on original upload and is not exportable at this time upon transferring to new instance
- You may support the community by boosting and positively interacting with everyone
- No Loli
- No Bots w/o Approval
- Respect Others
If you're feeling like supporting the photog.social Mastodon instance monetarily, feel free to choose an option below.
We appreciate it and 💘 the support!