While I also welcome #Redis offering their code under the #AGPLv3 license, I do note that developers still have to agree to three licenses, of which 2 are not open source, to get their contributions accepted and included upstream. https://github.com/redis/redis/blob/unstable/CONTRIBUTING.md
@kotaro gramted, all of tuhe #Forks that are #BSD-licensed had way more #effort put into them.
#SSPL is still worse than #AGPLv3, but #AGPL & #GPLv3 are just completely disregarding the legal reality of #IP and #Licensing.
Needless to say if I were a #developer of it and had contributed under #BSD license I'd expect to either get my code removed entirely or the license to be kept the same.
I will believe that a company that offers software they exclusively control under the AGPLv3 license truly embraces the Open Source Community when they accept a contribution under AGPLv3 from me and meet all of the obligations of the license for network-based services they offer that uses my contribution.
If you're a #Drupal developer check out new Requests for Proposals to add functionality to #agplv3 #legal #tech Project LACI. See https://www.lonestarlegal.org/request-for-proposals/ .
Deadline for proposals is May 5, 2025
@BKG
Anscheined ist das Softwaremodul #SSR2OBS zentral für die Anwendung. Gibt es Pläne, das zum allgemeinen Download zur Verfügung zu stellen? Noch besser, als #opensource?
Dual-Licensing mit einer restriktiven Copyleft-Lizenz wie #AGPLv3 wäre für Hobbyanwender und Forschung völlig ausreichend.
@landley @burnoutqueen Yeah...
#GPLv3 is a desaster as it's 99% ideology and 1% license text and alongside #AGPLv3 completely ignores the reality of how #licensing and #patents and #IP works.
And on the flipside we basically get "source available" stuff like #SSPL which only serves as a means to commit #AssetDenial and monopolize commercial offerings...
Craig Topham, our Copyright & Licensing Associate, got together with the founder of #Abelujo, a #FreeSoftware solution for managing #BookStores. Read about Abelujo's backstory, uses, and future here: https://u.fsf.org/46d #FSF #AGPLv3
@Nicholasr_ITSulu @nixCraft nodds in agreement and since there are so many stakeholders with opposing interests and a #copyleft license, #GAFAMs can't #enshittify or #tivolize it!
@GossiTheDog consider putting all your content under #AGPLv3, #SSPL or even better #CCBYNCND?
One can really see this is an older video, as it misses not only #0BSD between #PublicDomain and #MIT but also #SSPL right of #AGPLv3 in a tab that's right of it called "#AssetDenial" or "#Monopolistic" or just "#AssholeLicensing" and a tab right of that for "#SourceAvailable" licensing, but I get ahead of myself...
@fell @Liberapay @opencollective also considering how the main Server & Client for #Matrix is "asshole-licensed" under #AGPLv3 I'd rather setup @zulip & @jitsimeetinstances / #JitsiMeet.