photog.social is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
A place for your photos and banter. Photog first is our motto Please refer to the site rules before posting.

Administered by:

Server stats:

251
active users

#licensing

2 posts2 participants0 posts today

alojapan.com/1274802/tms-partn TMS partners with Hokkaido University in Japan to develop treatment for spinal cord injury #Hokkaido #HokkaidoTopics #HokkaidoUniversity #injury #Japan #licensing #SpinalCord #Therapeutics #TMS #北海道 TMS Co. has entered into an exclusive worldwide license agreement with Hokkaido University concerning a therapeutic candidate for the treatment of spinal cord injury. As part of its efforts to expand the pipeline, the company has been searching fo…

Are you a developer and have headaches managing licenses? REUSE makes it pretty straightforward!

reuse.software/

REUSE is a tool and specification that helps you clearly declare license information in your code using standardized SPDX headers. It makes #FreeSoftware licensing easier, more consistent, and automatable.

Both humans and machines can quickly understand how your code can be used!

reuse.softwareREUSE - Make licensing easy for everyoneWe make licensing easy for humans and machines alike. REUSE solves a fundamental issue that Free Software licensing has at the very source. Adopting our recommendations is as easy as one-two-three!
Replied in thread

@kotaro gramted, all of tuhe #Forks that are #BSD-licensed had way more #effort put into them.

#SSPL is still worse than #AGPLv3, but #AGPL & #GPLv3 are just completely disregarding the legal reality of #IP and #Licensing.

Needless to say if I were a #developer of it and had contributed under #BSD license I'd expect to either get my code removed entirely or the license to be kept the same.

Replied in thread

@jbqueru @bekit It's still a difficult challenge. Reminded of an article that @bkuhn wrote a few years ago:

sfconservancy.org/blog/2022/ma

Software Freedom ConservancyCopyleft Won't Solve All Problems, Just Some of ThemToward a Broad Ethical Software Licensing CoalitionWe are passionate about and dedicated to the cause of software freedom and rights because proprietary software harmfully takes control of and agency in software away from users. In 2014, we started talking about FOSS as fundamental to “ethical software” (and, more broadly “ethical technology”) — which contrasts FOSS with the unethical behavior that Big Tech carries out with proprietary software. Some FOSS critics (circa 2018) coined the phrase “ethical source” — which outlined a new approach to these issues — based on the assumption that software freedom activists were inherently complicit in the bad behavior of Big Tech and other bad actors since the inception of FOSS. These folks argue that copyleft — the only form of software licensing that makes any effort to place ethical and moral requirements on FOSS redistributors/reusers — has fundamentally ignored the larger problems of society such as human rights abuses and unbridled capitalism. They propose new copyleft-like licenses, which, rather than focusing on the requirement of disclosure of source code, they instead use the mechanisms of copyleft to mandate behaviors in areas of ethics generally unrelated to software. For example, the Hippocratic License molds a copyleft clause into a generalized mechanism for imposing a more comprehensive moral code on software redistributors/re-users. In essence, they argue that copylefted software (such as software under the GPL) is unethical software. This criticism of copyleft reached crescendo in the last three weeks as pundits began to criticize FOSS licenses for failing to prohibit Putin from potentially using FOSS in his Ukrainian invasion or other bad acts.