Response to a troll for the opportunity to say publicly why — in 2015 — I stopped saying “GNU/Linux”:
I say “Linux-based systems” — which I also recommended for SFC's stylesheet.
I ceased saying “ga-new-slash-lynn-ox” when Richard Stallman (RMS) chastised me for saying “Linux” (but not “GNU”) in a post about VMWare's #GPL violation. I *had* mentioned GNU GPL;no GNU software was in their product.
RMS told me I harmed #GNU every time I didn't footnote the word “Linux” & explain GNU/Linux.
(1/3)
I have something else to be thankful for today. At this moment in time I am busy restoring functionality on systems so that I will be able to resume important remote tasks, which shall enable me to restore the level that I am used to, when it comes down to actual value of goods
This work is highly specialized and needs a set of computing systems, communication systems which use GSM messaging systems and other means of signalling, in order to properly Act, monitor react and deploy the remote systems, of which a set of those are managed deployed monitored and configured through Proxmox.
@gyptazy has made incredibly wonderful contributions to the community of Open Source and I'm specifically highlighting his work in for example the great Proxmox load balancer.
Through the Work Of Him and other hundreds to thousands nameless Open Source coders, programmers en hackers am I able to do this work.
I am fortunate enough to have virtually met him here on the FediVerse through a beautiful forward that @stefano has made.
Without the work of this incredible people none of this would have been possible. I would be sitting watching this beautiful scenery that I would have made myself with props
There would not be any Open Source Operating System driving the displays.
Being Grateful is important. Giving Thanks sends a beautifully modulated Pulse of Energy through the Universe to everyone.
I am thankful to you all
Suggesting, as you did, that Big Tech is an ally in “right to repair” is classic cooption — same kind of cooption that led to Big Tech exploiting #FOSS,not complying with #copyleft & #GPL …even while spokespeople & lawyers for Big Tech lament that FOSS “isn't sustainable”.
r0ml once put it well as “free as in market, not free as in ride”. Problem is:Big Tech doesn't want a free & fair market for FOSS,so there is no way they want that for right to repair either.
Cc: @wwahammy @josh
There's a gamut of developments at the CaliXos community.
Most of them are good for the individuals involved, but not for the continuity of the Operating System as the whole.
You shall not be able to update your device anymore you will have to transition to another operating system which is still supported for your particular device.
CaliXos supports 25 + devices.
From what I have gathered by briefly reading the statement, programming patching and development has been frozen until further notice
TLDR {Too long didn't read} you have to install another operating system if you are running CaliXos
#OpenSource #OperatingSystem #CaliXos #Android #programming #alternative #Free #as #in #Beer #POSIX #GNU #GPL #development #Freeze
https://calyxos.org/news/2025/08/01/a-letter-to-our-community/
What happened to @till in part shows why billionaires' whims shouldn't control software…
https://ubuntu.social/@till/114932477260801209
Mark Shuttleworth once shouted that “Software Freedom Conservancy is just like Microsoft” & publicly stated I was a “McCarthyist” for enforcing #GPL. Like most billionaires, he says & does whatever he wants & faces no consequences.
You are far from the only employee he has mistreated & most go on to do their greatest work after leaving Shuttleworth's company. I'm sure you will too.
@glynmoody #Microsoft does have one viable solution, and it would require relinquishing some control. It would work like this:
The net effect: for the cost of perhaps a few to several million Euros, is that Microsoft [US] could maintain status quo the EU, except insofar as becoming unable to violate EU or member state law at the behest of the US government. The same model can be replicated in other jurisdictions, such as #Canada, and by other multinational digital services providers, such as #Alphabet (Google).
To make this happen, EU (and other) governments can require it as a condition of continuing to do business with Microsoft (and other multinationals).
Maintaining a monolithic multinational corporation is the legal equivalent of maintaining a flat network. Internationally federating a multinational corporation is the legal equivalent of maintaining a well segmented network. In the coming years, US-based Big Tech companies will need to firewall their non-US operations off from themselves, as outline above. And non-US governments will need to mandate that. The sanctioning of the #ICC was already proof of that necessity.
@carnage4life Good point & re: Brad Smith. His name is in the top five reasons why I stopped accepting "Brad" as my name circa 2001…I did not wanna share a name with the (then) General Counsel of $MSFT.
I think many don't realize that there is a *lawyer* (not a technologist) who has been President of Microsoft for years.
Brad Smith is also believed to be (we can't prove it — Microsoft state secrets) the mastermind behind the anti-#copyleft / anti-#GPL campaign of the early 2000s.
Cc: @liw
@phloggen suggested:
> Founding documents should automatically expire when there is no longer a ⅔ majority of…affected population who…voted to affirm it.
A fascinating suggestion. Now I'm trying to figure out if it's possible to apply this idea to #copyleft licenses like #GPL &/or copyleft-@next.
One difficulty in #FOSS governance accomplished through licensing is: many don't know they're governed by them &/or they benefit indirectly & silently from the rights therein.
Cc: @richardfontana