🌈 Social 📸 Photography 🌈

El DuvelleAnyone (academic / researcher) had recent experience with submitting to <a href="https://neuromatch.social/tags/ScienceAdvances" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#ScienceAdvances</a> (<a href="https://www.science.org/journal/sciadv" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank">https://www.science.org/journal/sciadv</a>)? Good or bad?We submitted there about 3 months ago and heard absolutely nothing since then..<a href="https://neuromatch.social/tags/SciRev" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#SciRev</a> does not have many reviews of that journal for 2025: <a href="https://scirev.org/reviews/science-advances/" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank">https://scirev.org/reviews/science-advances/</a> (BTW, please try to comment on your submission experience on there when you can!)<a href="https://neuromatch.social/tags/Academia" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Academia</a> <a href="https://neuromatch.social/tags/Research" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Research</a> <a href="https://neuromatch.social/tags/AcademicChatter" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#AcademicChatter</a>

El DuvelleLooking into <a href="https://neuromatch.social/tags/ScienceAdvances" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#ScienceAdvances</a> as a journal to publish in.. Why is there a reference limit, and why is it so low (80 references)? In this day and age? For an online-only journal?<a href="https://www.science.org/journal/sciadv" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank">https://www.science.org/journal/sciadv</a>PS: remember that you can rate the submission & revision process of journals on <a href="https://neuromatch.social/tags/SciRev" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#SciRev</a> <a href="https://scirev.org/" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank">https://scirev.org/</a><a href="https://neuromatch.social/tags/ScientificPublishing" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#ScientificPublishing</a> <a href="https://neuromatch.social/tags/Academia" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Academia</a> <a href="https://neuromatch.social/tags/ScientificJournals" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#ScientificJournals</a>

Dave MuthOr it's alien nachos! <a href="https://mas.to/tags/Science" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Science</a> <a href="https://mas.to/tags/ScienceAdvances" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#ScienceAdvances</a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/@ScienceScholar/113545592073148149" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank">https://mastodon.social/@ScienceScholar/113545592073148149</a>

Matt Hodgkinson"Elite" peer review was studied by Daniel Larremore and colleagues using an anonymised dataset from AAAS of 112,000 papers submitted to Science and Science Advances. A few more desk rejects for women authors, but no difference in peer review. Clear preference for work from prestigious institutions: biased or just better? Big teams also do better. <a href="https://scicomm.xyz/tags/ICSSI" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#ICSSI</a> <a href="https://scicomm.xyz/tags/ScienceofScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#ScienceofScience</a> <a href="https://scicomm.xyz/tags/PeerReview" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#PeerReview</a> <a href="https://scicomm.xyz/tags/ScienceMagazine" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#ScienceMagazine</a> <a href="https://scicomm.xyz/tags/ScienceAdvances" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#ScienceAdvances</a> <a href="https://scicomm.xyz/tags/DanielLarremore" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#DanielLarremore</a> <a href="https://scicomm.xyz/tags/AAAS" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#AAAS</a>

Matt HodgkinsonCor. "Writing in Science Advances, the physicists describe how the half milligram particle was gently pulled by a 30-attonewton force in their experiment. An attonewton is one billionth of a billionth of a newton. “It’s definitely not yet quantum gravity, but it’s a stepping stone towards it”."<a href="https://www.theguardian.com/science/2024/feb/23/quantum-physics-microscopic-gravity-discovery" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank">https://www.theguardian.com/science/2024/feb/23/quantum-physics-microscopic-gravity-discovery</a><a href="https://scicomm.xyz/tags/QuantumGravity" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#QuantumGravity</a> <a href="https://scicomm.xyz/tags/ScienceAdvances" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#ScienceAdvances</a> <a href="https://scicomm.xyz/tags/ExperimentalPhysics" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#ExperimentalPhysics</a> <a href="https://scicomm.xyz/tags/ParticlePhysics" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#ParticlePhysics</a>

TC (Tirthankar Chakraborty)This is a frankensteinian mishmash of results from older, recent, and upcoming papers, which I have somehow managed to cobble together. Covers lessons learned about urban heat across scales and differences when using <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/heatstress" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#heatstress</a> metrics.Relevant papers:Our <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/ScienceAdvances" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#ScienceAdvances</a> paper comparing surface versus canopy <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/urban" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#urban</a> heat island: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abb9569" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abb9569</a>Our <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/AguAdvances" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#AguAdvances</a> paper examining <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/humidity" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#humidity</a> feedback on urban <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/heat" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#heat</a> exposure across scales: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022AV000729" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2022AV000729</a>

Recent searches

Search options

Administered by:

Server stats:

#scienceadvances