photog.social is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
🌈 An inclusive place for your photos, silliness, and convos! 🌈

Administered by:

Server stats:

249
active users

#IRDA

0 posts0 participants0 posts today
Replied in thread

@adisonverlice I mean, I could see something like an #IrDA or #BLE / #WiFi thingy that basically exchanges packages kinda like a bulk delivery that one just slaps onto a device.

  • Kinda the #DataMule idea some folks suggested to do with like( informal) (mini)bus services in the global south to get large amounts of data to areas that have no internet or only slow narrowband connectivity at best.

A ground-based alternative to #BlockstreamSatellite would be kinda cool espechally since they use #Shitcoin (#Bitcoin) and transfer of data is just absurdly expensive by pricing.

Replied in thread

@stman @50htz @vidak @theruran @forthy42 Yet somehow we've to deal with changing conditions and pretty shure you too have to admit that having a link that may throttle due to weather is better than having no link or poor reliability because it needs perfect conditions.

Optical PtP links outside of laboratories have to deal with changing and adverse conditions and somehow you gotta have to communicate between the units if they loose contact or that the error rate is too high so they need to renegotiate a lower link width.

  • Espechally since this ain't like EuroDOCSIS where interference is minimal unless people actively sabotage things.

I'm also referencing #IrDA because they did already do some fundamental research.

  • And whilst I was looking I found out that there's also a lack of newly-made IrDA transciever chips like the STIR4220 so designing a new one (even if it's just an FPGA reimplementation) is desireable for a lot of "legacy" applications as well as secure data exchange on short distance.
Replied in thread

@stman @50htz @vidak @theruran @forthy42 merely doubling the baudrate per wavelenght compared to #RONJA can yield 100MBit/s at 5 wavelenghts, whilst offering us better link budget & range.
infosec.space/@kkarhan/1147195

Not to mention #IrDA as a protocol could be repurposed as a diagnostics / link renegotiation channel and even as ultra-long-range / narrowband & broadcasting (PtMP) solution (see #IrLAN)…

Note that the maximum possible range achieveable under lab conditions will be way better than the real-world outputs, simply because not only does humidity and rain exist, but where it doesn't (i.e. deserts) thermal stress and expansion is moving things out of optimal alignment over the day...

  • And in a lab you don't have things potentially disturbing it.
Infosec.SpaceKevin Karhan :verified: (@kkarhan@infosec.space)@stman@mastodon.social @vidak@social.solarpunk.au @50htz@cathode.church @theruran@masto.hackers.town @forthy42@mastodon.net2o.de granted, this isn't rocket science as both high-quality, rugged (industrial grade temperature range), longlife LEDs do exist and both colour-filters for input and output that are colour-stable yet affordable with low light loss are existing on the market. If we were to look at COTS parts, we shurely should look at LEDs and Lasers in common wavelenghts. These are the ones where one can find on the market: ``` 940 nm (medium-IR, modern NV) 850 nm (near-IR, old NV) 780 nm (near-IR; CDs) 670 nm (red, HiVision Laserdisc) 650 nm (red, DVDs) 638 nm (orange) 532 nm (green) 510 nm (bright-green) 488 nm (blue) 405 nm (blue-violet, HD-DVD & BDs) 385 nm (violet, *"black light"*) 365 nm (UV, document verificators) ``` Assuming those get only `monomode` each and we're going with 10/12 error correction that means we got 10x the available spectrum and 10x the bandwidth of the RONJA at the same baud rate. OFC I'd assume for cost reasons it would rather be a a *"RGB+"* setup with a potential "`multimode`" setup to reduce costs for parts whist achieving the same throughput at lower baud rate. ``` 940 nm (IR) 650 nm (red) 532 nm (green) 405 nm (blue-violet) 365 nm (UV) ``` In the end, component costs and -limitations are what limit the "visible light PtP links" performance... - OFC getting one of those cheap 500mm/800mm f/8 optics and 2x teleconverters to zoom onto the other end as well as recessing it into a case (similar to a CCTV camera or rather telescope) could also yield better results and reduce issues with light bleed and disruptions even when installed at suboptimal angles with "noise sources" (ambient light pollution, sun) disturbing. In the end this could even adapt the link width automatically and even renegotiate it with any switch if done properly, as downgrading to 10 Mbit/s is preferable to total link loss... In fact, companies like [TESAT](https://www.tesat.de/products) already do this for their optical intersatellite link systems, delivering up to 100Gbit/s over 80.000km at 340W power draw and 34kg weight. So I'm shure 1/100th in terms of speed, power consumption and 1/10.000th of lenght and 1/4 of weight is achieveable with COTS parts.
Replied in thread

@riley Case in point, #IrDA on optical bandwiths would work excellent for #DataExchange on #airgapped systems with minimal risk of violating #TEMPEST or similar standards, thus making RED/BLACK seperation in various projects on mine simpler.

  • Not to mention it's trivial to spoof or merely jam #wireless #RF like #NFC]* and thus denying the ability to use these, whereas it's harder to block a line-of-sight without being identified as root cause of it.
en.wikipedia.orgAir gap (networking) - Wikipedia
Replied in thread

@riley it's not just about being able to reimplement the spec which in terms of SIR is a trivial way to make 9600/8/N/1 half-duplex connections but also to read the rationale behind their decisions.

  • Also being able to overcome the limitations of #RONJA and #IrDA as systems (as far as possible) is desireable.

(i.e. there are less sources of green and blue light in nature and water doesn't attenuate blue light even remotely as much as red, so there's that benefit)...

Infosec.SpaceKevin Karhan :verified: (@kkarhan@infosec.space):boost_ok: Does anyone have the full #specifications for [IrDA](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IrDA) #archived somewhere? Because I'm looking for a good, short-range protocol that is less complex than #LiFi [*](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Li-Fi) for a [*"digital dead drop"*](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dead_drop#Modern_techniques). Most notably because [USB dead drops](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USB_dead_drop#Potential_drawbacks) have a shitton of disadvantages as #USB is not designed for that in mind, is extrenmely susceptible to sabotage and vandalism as a #PirateBox [*](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PirateBox#Uses), less complex than #FreedomBox [*](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FreedomBox#Commercial_product) for #Sneakernet [*](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sneakernet) operations. Given the IrDA spec is relatively simple on the physical interface, reimplementing it with visible light would allow for more options espechally when it comes to *"broadcasting"* data to multiple devices when #datacasting like #Toosheh [*](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toosheh) would be overkill...
Replied in thread

@riley The #IrOBEX standard is part of the whole #IrDA specification...

The most interesting part is the #LowLevel stuff, cuz theoretically one could just apply that to any optical system ranging from consumer LEDs to Laser pointers to fiberoptical assemblies.

  • But most importantly I do think that IrDA would work great at a diagnostics / negotiation system for the revised #RONJA PtP link that @stman is working on, aiming to do 100 Mbit/s Ethernet with cheap COTS parts.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RONJA

As IR will be extremely quickly attenuated by the slightest amount of atmospheric moisture (aka. rain and fog) using visible light spectrum is an easier workaround.

  • Plus that tech he's working on could yield a better short-range, contactless data exchange protocol where WiFi, and Bluetooth are not desireable and where passive security-by-design is desireable.
en.wikipedia.orgRONJA - Wikipedia
Replied in thread

@stman @vidak @50htz @theruran @forthy42 as for "protocol" I'd recommend to take a closer look at #IrDA since there are a shitton of cheap transcievers and implementations available and it would allow this to be reused for a secure P2P data exchange and secure contactless networking solution that is inherently harder (if not basically impossible) to eavesdrop on compared to #Bluetooth and #WiFi.

  • Plus it'll be a potentially better alternative to #LiFi for #Broadcast useage.

Not to mention I've not seen any IrDA devices >4MBit/s in the wild, with most being 9600bit/s #serial links fir the most part, and having a direct optical data exchange that takes literal seconds instead of minutes would really have a lot of good use cases i.e. in medical fields, where having a fully sterilizeable computer is kibda important and having a docking cradle with a charging coil and optical "port" would really be appreciated.

In fact ITU G.9991 (G.vlc) & IEEE 802.11bb are worth looking into as well just to see advantages and disadvantages...

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IrDA
en.mikipedia.org/wiki/Li-Fi

en.wikipedia.orgIrDA - Wikipedia
Replied in thread

[4/6]
Finding a compatible #IrDA dongle at a reasonable price is quite a challenge and most of them no longer have current working drivers.

Fortunately SCUBA divers use IrDA for a lot of their old devices and on the Scubaboard forum I learned at the heart of some IrDA dongles was a Moschip or Asix chip MCS7780 and there is a working driver for these.

I searched for a list of dongles that used this chip and found an old one by Gearmo for only 40 bucks on Ebay.

Replied in thread

[3/6]
We have two objectives to get this going:
- Install the #IrDA stack.
- Find a compatible dongle with working drivers.

Let’s begin by installing the stack. It’s the easiest part and only takes a few minutes.

In #Windows 10 open Settings and select System > Optional Features > Add a Feature. Now scroll down the list and select “IrDA Infrared” to install it.

After a few minutes it should be installed! Awesome! We are half way there!

Continued thread

[2/6]
There is a lot of old and outdated information concerning #IrDA on Windows 10. It also does not help that the information is spread across all parts of the web.

For someone like me who had no experience with IrDA it was a massive amount of scattered information the sift through.

I want to thank everyone that helped me out and offered advice.

Hopefully having all of this info consolidated here will help others and ease efforts to keep these devices fully functional.

[1/6]
At the beginning of this year I set out with a goal to restore FULL #PocketPC compatibility on a current #Windows 10 #PC.

We outlined how to both establish a connection AND Sync here… mas.to/@Judeau/112678025590638

We looked at different keyboards and how to transfer Word files while preserving formatting here… mas.to/@Judeau/112689361744308

The last piece of the puzzle was restoring wireless #IrDA connectivity.

Spoiler alert: I got it!